Jagdeo, Hoyte commit to inclusive govt, dialogue
Stabroek News
March 22, 2001
President Bharrat Jagdeo and former president and PNC leader Desmond
Hoyte have approved a statement presented to them by former US
President Jimmy Carter committing to inclusive government and dialogue
at the top levels of the two parties they represent.
The draft puts in more detail, comments by former US president Jimmy
Carter on Tuesday for the need for more executive powers to be placed
in the hands of parliament. Carter who left yesterday, had led a
44-member delegation to observe Monday's elections. A Carter Center
press release said that "both leaders and their associates
approved the text and pledged to implement its provisions as
expeditiously as possible."
Amongst these provisions is a referendum on the revised constitution
within 12 months:
"Recognizing the need for political, cultural and economic
progress in Guyana, we agree that the first major step must be to
complete the work of the special select committee (on constitutional
reform), which will result in a new constitution for our nation. The
constitution will be put to a referendum for approval by the citizens
of Guyana within 12 months. Adequate staffing and resources will be
provided to implement its provisions.
"Our goal will be inclusive organisation of government within
which the majority and opposition political parties will both be
involved in the leadership of parliamentary standing committees and
the selection of leaders to fulfil major responsibilities of governing
and management. These will include but not be limited to the Chief
Justice and Chancellor, the Auditor General, members of a strong human
rights commission and an ethnic relations commission, the allocation
of land and housing, the tendering of contracts, a permanent committee
on constitutional reform and a permanent Elections Commission. A new
elections code is needed, with provision for the maintenance of an
accurate voters list.
"We will cooperate fully in maintaining a constructive dialogue
between the top leaders of the PPP/Civic and the PNC REFORM parties
and will include appropriate representation from other political and
civic organisations, including the Amerindian community and women."
Elections Commission
probing alleged discrepancy in results
The Elections Commission has initiated an investigation into the
results it has published for Regions Three and Four as requested by
the PNC REFORM.
The PPP/Civic is also to request such a probe, as it claimed it had
found discrepancies in results computed for two areas.
In the interim, PNC REFORM chairman, Robert Corbin, cautioned his
party's supporters to be calm and vigilant and promised to accept the
elections results if the process was transparent.
In a letter to Chairman of the Elections Commission Major General Joe
Singh yesterday, Corbin pointed to "a discrepancy in the results
for the PPP/C in District Three which shows more than 3,000 additional
votes for that party than the number reflected in the figures derived
from the statement of poll for that district."
Corbin said too that "the same trends appear in some of the
preliminary results announced for Georgetown in District Four,"
adding that in such circumstances "the PNC will have great
difficulty in endorsing the preliminary results being announced by the
commission until a reconciliation of the figures is possible."
Asked at a press conference last night whether the commission was
addressing the PNC REFORM's complaints, Chief Election Officer (ag)
Gocool Boodoo said the commission would have to answer that since such
responsibility did not fall under his purview as he was only the head
of the commission's secretariat.
And PPP/Civic General Secretary, Donald Ramotar, at a press
conference yesterday afternoon, said his party had proof of wrong
figures being computed at GECOM to the detriment of the PPP/C.
Ramotar held up documents which he said showed one example each of
mistakes made when computing the results of polling stations at Covent
Garden and the Guyana School of Agriculture. The results at these
polling stations showed that the PPP/C had won the most votes but the
larger amount was tallied for the PNC/R instead.
PPP central executive committee member Ralph Ramkarran said these
errors will be taken up with GECOM and he was sure that they would be
addressed.
Likewise, the commission will surely address any errors found by the
PNC/R, too, he said. The problems encountered by the PNC/R were not
peculiar to that party, he stated.
Corbin told a press conference earlier in the day that with regard to
Region Four, it had been hard to reconcile figures for Georgetown
which showed the PPP/C with 132,000 votes and his party with 137,000.
The figures the PNC had, save for a few divisions in Kitty, gave the
PPP/C 18,000 and his party 57,000.
He said that based on the results the PNC had from the divisions it
had analysed "the elections were very close and the PNC REFORM
remains very optimistic."
Corbin criticised the format in which the results were being reported
which made it difficult for people to determine whether the official
results of their polling place had been accurately transmitted,
recorded and published by the Elections Commission.
"Unless the format is adjusted, reconciliation of the announced
results with the statements of poll, with the possible exception of
District Four will be impossible."
Corbin said the change in the reporting format for District Four
resulted from representation by its representatives on the commission.
He said too that the PNC wanted the commission to return to the
practice of announcing the results of each polling station to which
Guyanese were accustomed.
Corbin in response to several questions said that the PNC REFORM
documented complaints from 2,500 people on Monday who were
disenfranchised by either being omitted from the final voters list
erroneously for one reason or another or given addresses in another
district. He said he was sure that several thousand more were
similarly affected.
To questions about irregularities reported by its agents on Monday,
Corbin said these were either reported to the police or the Elections
Commission. He said that the party took that course of action to
defuse tension, adding that it had not publicised an incident at Zee
Lust where its agents were chased out of the polling place with
cutlasses. He said that the intervention of the police was sought to
have the issue resolved.
Corbin asserted that the party also acted responsibly over the
national ID cards found at the dumpsite. He said that he had rung
Commission Chairman Joe Singh about the discovery. He said that the
party acted in that way to allow the commission to address an obvious
breach of its security.
He disagreed with Singh that only one card was found, explaining that
the party had pictures of three that had been found. He said that the
PNC had also interviewed quietly two of the persons for whom the cards
had been made and the report sent to the commission.
With regard to the persons who were disenfranchised, Corbin blamed
the errors on the Information Systems Department of the commission
whose technical officers, he said, misled the commission by assuring
that the errors, which had been brought to the attention of the
commission, had been addressed.
He urged an audit of all the transactions related to the voters list
and the database from which it was generated. But he noted that an
audit would not restore the persons who had been disenfranchised,
expressing disappointment that the PNC's representations about its
concerns about the operations of computer department were not
entertained.
About the complaints of disenfranchisement, Ramotar said his party
had cause to complain about similar problems in its strongholds.
He noted that GECOM, the international observer teams and local
observers had already testified to the systemic nature of these
difficulties at all the polling stations throughout the country.
Ramotar also pointed out that the PPP/C had not been in favour of
GECOM's temporary decision to extend the time of polling.
He said it was observed that only certain polling stations, mainly in
Georgetown, seemed to have been informed of this decision.
"Indeed the temporary extension of polling time opened the
window for multiple voting, and other forms of irregular activities in
several of the Georgetown polling centres," the PPP general
secretary said.
He said while the party was concerned over the irregularities
resulting from the poll extension, it was encouraged by the findings
of the observers that the irregularities could not affect the outcome
of the elections.
Elections broadly
met international benchmarks
EU, Long-Term Observer missions
The Joint European Union and Long-Term Observer Mission has stated
that the elections have broadly met international benchmarks and that
omissions from the voters list were not confined to any particular
region or party.
The election observation mission issued its preliminary statement
yesterday at the Cara Inn. The detailed report covers the five months
the two teams have been in place starting with the claims and
objections period described as "frustrating for the ordinary
citizen ...."
In its assessment of polling day the two teams, with some 65
observers covering 571 stations, said that "voters across the
country were peaceful and patient" and "very few
irregularities were reported... However, the voters list, despite
substantial efforts by GECOM, contained a number of flaws. In
particular, a number of people who had taken time to be photographed,
and in some cases even possessed a national ID card, did not appear in
the correct division of the official list of electors. This created
understandable frustration among citizens across the country and among
supporters of all parties."
Head of the Guyana Long-Term Observation Group, Simon Osborn, said
that apart from complaints received by observers, it was impossible to
quantify the numbers of persons who were affected.
The statement continued: "the extension of the hours of polling
led to considerable confusion and in some cases confrontation at the
place of poll. This sadly disrupted what had until then been a
peaceful election day.... In three areas Victoria on the East Coast
and in East and West Ruimveldt, observers withdrew following threats
received from hostile crowds. These events are most regrettable but
have not prevented our teams from returning to monitor the tabulation
of results."
The report also noted "the disappointing delay in the release of
preliminary results" and that " this has led to speculation
among stakeholders... We continue to monitor the counting process."
In the study of preparations for election day the two missions made a
number of observations including "the clear administrative
failures" in the voter registration process including "poor
production line management during the processing of information from
Master Registration Cards through to the collation of the ID cards
into the appropriate canisters for distribution." The report
described the GECOM systems as "overly bureaucratic and prone to
administrative failures... There is, we believe, a clear need to
review the process of voter registration and to place it on a
permanent basis."
Vincent de Visscher, head of the European Delegation in Guyana said
in a comment after the press conference that the European Union would
look at assistance for a house-to-house registration exercise and the
establishment of a database which could be updated regularly.
The report continued that the OLE and its addendum did not seem to
have addressed all of the 23,000 errors on the revised voters list.
Asked whether the missions believed there was any fraud involved in
the mistakes on the list Osborn said the mission had not seen any
evidence of fraud as yet. The report asked "that to allay
concerns over these shortcomings we would urge GECOM to undertake a
thorough external audit of the computer software and systems and in
the interests of transparency publish any consequential report."
As regards the campaigning by the parties - also part of the
observers' mandate, the statement noted that the campaign was on the
whole, free from violence with a few notable exceptions and all
parties were to be congratulated in ensuring that the atmosphere was
largely free from intimidation. But "it is also a concern that
speakers at some meetings played on the divisions in society and
sought to bring out some fears and prejudices of parts of the
population." It is recommended that the National Assembly provide
for an agreed and enforceable code of conduct for parties during the
election campaign and that the Ethnic Relations Commission and
tribunal be appointed to prohibit the use of language that could
incite racial violence or hatred.
The report made a preliminary conclusion that "the difficulties
in the election process are attributable to a wide range of factors,
some of which are technical indicating a lack of adequate preparation
and human error and others structural due to the polarisation of
politics in Guyana. Notwithstanding these factors the elections have
broadly met the international benchmarks."
The long-term observers of both missions will remain in the country
until the duly elected president is sworn in.
Monday's voting
mainly satisfactory - OAS mission
The Organisation of American States (OAS) observer mission says
Monday's general election was in the main a satisfactory process and
the shortcomings experienced should not detract from this.
In a statement last night, the OAS Electoral Observation Mission
(OAS-EOM) to Guyana said "the elections of 19 March 2001 were
orderly, peaceful and largely incident-free thereby creating
conditions for the free expression of the will of the people". It
added that the shortcomings experienced, however, point to areas of
procedural and systemic weaknesses that need to be tackled.
Fielding 33 observers in all 10 polling districts, the OAS team said
the most serious problem encountered during voting derived from the
errors and omissions in the Official List of Electors (OLE) and its
Addendum. The OAS team pointed out that anxieties had been voiced by
all parties during the run-up to elections. "In this regard, the
remedial efforts of the Elections Commission would appear to have
fallen short of expectations", the statement said.
The mission pointed out that the commission had made it clear before
March 19 that only those persons who were on the OLE would be
permitted to vote. As a result, a number of persons seeking to
exercise their franchise - some with recently issued identity cards
and some with stubs indicating that they had been photographed during
the registration process - were unable to vote as their names were not
on the voters list. "The number of persons affected varied from
polling station to polling station and from region to region. The
OAS-EOM was unable to quantify the extent of this problem", the
statement added.
It pointed out that the closing of polls at 6 pm was affected by the
announcement at that hour by the commission that they should remain
open. This was followed swiftly by a reversal of the decision. "Confusion
and inconsistencies ensued. In certain districts, persons rushed to
polling stations in the hope of casting their ballots causing surges
of tension. The closing time of polling stations varied and in
Georgetown some remained open as late as 9 pm".
While extraordinarily detailed and time consuming, the OAS-EOM says
the required procedures for the counting process were "scrupulously
followed" in the stations checked by the mission.
"In a highly pressurised and polarised atmosphere where time was
of the essence, Guyana's election officials exerted themselves
mightily to fulfil their tasks and rise up to the high expectations
placed on them", the team declared. It added, however, that
several significant changes in election policy were made very late in
the process including the very late designation of polling stations. "Efforts
made to accommodate concerns relating to the transparency and
integrity of the process did not always achieve the desired objective,
as was the case with the transmission of preliminary results, which
was slow and not always informative", the OAS-EOM stated.
It said that the early hours of polling day was "blemished"
by a number of logistical and administrative glitches which included
unfamiliarity with the process and missing voter paraphernalia. Other
more serious faults such as late delivery of voting materials and the
shortage of polling station staff delayed the opening of stations in
some places. "These deficiencies were substantially corrected by
mid-morning and along with a decrease in the rate of turnout and the
growing confidence of polling station officials as their mastery of
the voting processes improved, led to a smoother flow of voters for
the remainder of the day".
The mission commended the electorate for voting in an orderly and
peaceful manner and for turning out in large numbers. This, it said,
was facilitated by the commitment and patience of polling station
officials.
The OAS-EOM was one of five overseas missions scrutinising the March
19 polls.
EAB's tally shows
PPP/C in the lead with 193,546 votes counted
The Electoral Assistance Bureau's (EAB) compilation of 193,546 votes
from 44% of the ballot boxes used in Monday's general elections shows
the PPP/Civic leading with 54.9%.
The PNC REFORM secured 40.4% of the votes tallied, followed by the
Guyana Action Party/Working People's Alliance score of 1.7% and the
Rise, Organise and Rebuild Guyana movement (ROAR) at one per cent.
The Justice for All Party came in next with 0.67% of the votes,
followed by The United Force 0.6%. The Guyana Democratic Party secured
0.38% of those votes and the National Front Alliance 0.1%.
The count by the EAB covered all ten regions with 15 boxes from
Region One, 67 from Region Two, 142 from Region Three, 258 from Region
Four, 82 from Region Five, 164 from Region Six, 21 from Region Seven,
14 from Region Eight, 21 from Region Nine and 51 from Region Ten.
Disenfranchised
citizen wants explanation from GECOM
Retired public servant Basil Collins says he went through every
single step as mandated by the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) but
was still unable to vote on Monday.
He says the Guyana Elections Commission owes him an explanation why
his name had not appeared on the voters list. Collins was one of a
number of people who were disenfranchised. This number is still to be
quantified by the commission and political parties.
The elderly man said he had gone through all the procedures including
having his photograph taken. He told Stabroek News that he had
exhausted all efforts to get his name on the list.
He recounted how he had been photographed on October 20 last year
after the preliminary voters list was posted up and was given a stub
with the number 1706524. His wife and daughter had been registered at
the same time with him.
They received stubs with 1706525 and 1706526 respectively and
subsequently received their national identification cards and voted on
Monday.
Collins said that on February 10, he checked the revised voters list
at St Winifried's Primary School in Kitty where he had registered, but
his name was not there.
Collins was advised to go to the Campbellville Government School to
make enquiries. There, staff of GECOM were recording complaints
similar to Collins' for them to be addressed.
According to Collins, he went to the office of District Four's
returning officer at Carmichael and Lamaha streets on March 8, to
again file his complaint.
An official there made a note of his particulars and informed him
that his name would be on the addendum.
Two days later Collins returned to St Winifried's to check for his ID
card but was told again that his name was not on the list. Once again,
the officials took his particulars and said they would be forwarded to
GECOM for his situation to be rectified.
Collins said he made several telephone calls to GECOM up to March 17,
in an attempt to clarify the issue but his efforts were futile.
He said a call was also placed to the office of the Deputy Chief
Election Officer (Operations), Calvin Benn, whose secretary advised
that he call Mrs Samaroo, also of GECOM.
Contact was made with Samaroo, Collins said. But after going through
the pains of explaining his predicament to her, the woman informed
Collins that she had only recently assumed her position at GECOM and
could not be of any assistance.
"My concern is that I do not know why I have not been placed on
the list. No one at GECOM could tell me why. I have a Master
Registration Card Number allocated to me. How come two members of my
family are on the list and I am not?" Collins queried.
He feels GECOM owes him an explanation as to why his name had not
appeared on the voters list.