Time for a reorganisation of
Government's executive structure?
by Festus L. Brotherson, Jr.
Guyana Chronicle
May 9, 1999
EVENTS of the last few weeks, including the strike sanctioned by the
Trades Union Congress (TUC), make clearer the frustrating ever-present
reality that is the moribund Guyana of today.
Because trade unions have traditionally been politically aligned on
racial grounds, we must strip away the cover of a wages' dispute to find
the core problem. Middle and working class Blacks continue to believe
there is widespread prejudice by East Indians in the government domain
and some parts of the private sector.
There are also serious claims that East Indians are victims of organised
Black violence on grounds of racial discrimination.
Allegations on both sides have merits and flaws. This requires that the
issue of race be one of sustained highest priority by the Peoples'
Progressive Party government with its civic component (PPP/Civic).
Recently, the Guyana Airways Corporation (GAC) was locally privatised.
This suggests the stirrings of a positive outlook among Guyana's business
leaders. However, the very vexing reality of just how obstructive to
investments are racial animosities remains apparent.
Racism triggers political instability and a climate inhospitable for
major local and foreign investment. Economic growth falls short of high
expectations. Militant trade unionism is on the rise, and civil discourse
has been replaced by incendiary rhetoric.
Using violence and threats of it, the Black-dominated People's National
Congress (PNC) opposition party is trying to make Guyana "ungovernable",
while the government now warns it will no longer tolerate such
activities. There is a deadening paradox which must be resolved.
Racial tensions create political instability that checkmate economic
development in the context of a globalised economic world. Lack of
development intensifies racism and political instability in the infirm
democracy.
A fair question is this: failing resolution of the paradox, is regression
to authoritarian rule likely?
Towards abatement of the highly tense environment, a first step might
well have to be a significant reorganisation of the government's
executive structure. A malaise appears to have overcome many senior
personnel except in a few cases.
Previous PNC administrations mistakenly followed a policy of hardened
loyalty to some people over effective skills and performance. The country
is still trying to overcome the negative consequences of that approach to
policy-making and implementation.
Such a governance strategy usually institutionalises a paralysis of
ideas, emboldens corruption, widens inactivity, rewards swaggering
arrogance of the incompetent, nullifies fine work of talented colleagues,
and nurtures a perception of inability to provide good government.
Newspaper columnist, Allan Fenty, commented the other day about the
surprising defensive position from which the government's work proceeds.
Good government cannot be provided citizens from such a posture where the
public perception is that opposition forces command the national agenda
of priorities.
The public perception might be wrong and the allegation unfair. However,
when left unaddressed, perceptions become solid realities in human minds.
What we have in Guyana today are dangerous pent-up hostilities on both
sides of the ethnic divide, principally in Georgetown and a few other
parts of the country. Is this deja vu?
Recall that after the PPP was re-elected for a second consecutive term at
the 1961 general elections, a general strike by the TUC made Guyana
ungovernable. With American help in the Cold War context of that time,
the government was eventually forced from office.
Some say that because America's siding with the PNC and the then United
Force (UF) were proven to be a big mistake, the U.S. would back the
democratically elected PPP/Civic. Serious rethinking must be done here.
America has no friends in the anglophone Caribbean, only interests.
Never mind that Haitian precedent of military intervention (almost) to
reinstall former democratically elected president, Jean Bertrand
Aristide.
Consider that before the illegitimate PNC government the U.S. had
supported was finally removed from office in the watershed free and fair
1992 elections, the authoritarian PNC, much to the delight of the
Americans, suddenly began implementing free market policies that did
produce significant material benefits. That has stagnated since 1997.
Why this harping about the US? Its role as THE power broker on acceptable
and unacceptable governments in the Caribbean is paramount.
The cases of Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, Grenada, Jamaica,
etc., tell the story bluntly. We can invoke sovereignty, nationalism and
so on, but in the final analysis, those concepts matter little if at all.
National interest does define the foreign policies of nation states in
the region save on less important matters. The foreign interests of
superpower America defines national interests in the region. For some
reason, this fact remains lost on many.
Yes, PNC tactics are largely to blame for the current tensions.
However, beyond that, questions persist: how is it that Guyana is marking
time and opposition forces are increasingly successful at making the
country "ungovernable?" Did not the PPP/Civic win an overwhelming mandate
to govern? What has been learnt from the 1961-1964 tragedy? Pat answers
lack suasion with the passage of time.
There was genuine goodwill at the passing of the late Cheddi Jagan in
April 1997. The PPP/Civic benefited from that and swept back into power
convincingly.
However, powerful undercurrents of a racial divide have always driven the
real world of politics, and the December 1997 elections also had that
undercurrent which contributed to the PPP/Civic's victory. To believe and
say otherwise is to be disingenuous and unhelpful.
President Janet Jagan has strong support across the nation and she will
always have mine on grounds of electoral and moral merit and leadership
capacities. But in the stalemated climate where opposition forces are
holding development to ransom and government efforts to achieve it
without paying the ransom have stagnated, emotions have displaced logic
in the groundswell of discontent.
This is unfortunate because an important fact goes unrecognised. The
President has a good record on the matter of racial sensitivity regarding
top level appointments in several government agencies and the judiciary.
It would be demeaning of the government to name cases and places. Doing
so would create spectacles of the appointed talented personnel. It might
also set a trend that would sink Guyana into a morass of `numbers and
quotas' which we should avoid, and which does not work elsewhere despite
claims to the contrary.
What will be the next chapter in the `topsy turvy' polarised environment
in Guyana? Only God knows.
HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY!
|