Zero tolerance
Editorial
Stabroek News
March 20, 2001
We had argued before that no election is perfect. Given the time and
other constraints under which these elections were held there were
inevitably some mistakes. But the conditions under which the elections
would be held were eventually clearly and unanimously laid down by the
Elections Commission. No one not on the final list could vote and there
were several forms of identification allowed, including an oath of
identity.
Inevitably, this would have meant that some persons would not
have been able to vote who should have been on the list but were not. That
was certainly regrettable but this was the best that could have been done
to avoid chaos and having laid down the ground rules the Commission should
have stuck to them. And the political parties should have co-operated with
their rulings, especially as their own representatives on the commission
had been involved.
Be that as it may, the overall conduct of the
election was considered satisfactory by the chief election officer as
announced at his press conference and the opinion of the observers and
many voters to whom we had spoken by 9.30 pm last night when this
editorial was written was that the elections had been conducted in an
orderly and peaceful manner. Most polling officials were polite, efficient
and well organised.
Because of the fact that polling continued at some
stations well after the original deadline of 6.00 p.m. the count was
expected to be somewhat delayed and so the full unofficial results may not
be available by midday today as had originally been hoped. However,
hopefully, a large number of results will be announced starting from
around midnight.
Whatever the results most Guyanese will hope for
certain outcomes. First that whoever wins will accept that this is a
sensitive moment and that new initiatives must be taken to show the desire
for inclusiveness. It will also be hoped that the loser will accept defeat
with good grace.
Elections in Guyana are unbearably tense. Too much is
at stake. At the end of the day it is clear that dialogue must continue to
seek new systems and lasting solutions. The society cannot continue to
endure these stresses and strains and the resulting divisions.