Talk-show hosts' irresponsibility incendiary
-Media Monitors final report
Stations urged to cease programming of this kind
Stabroek News
March 31, 2001
The Media Monitoring Unit (MMU) has concluded that the Media Code of
Conduct failed to influence the media and that the talk-show hosts "pushed
the limits of irresponsibility to dangerous and incendiary levels."
In its final report for the Elections Commission on the media
coverage of the election, the MMU inevitably devoted much time to the
talk-show hosts, in particular Mark Benschop. In recalling Benschop's
almost 24-hour show starting on March 19 (polling day), the MMU stated
"...Mr Benschop again took to the air for the rest of the evening
and into early morning. By this time Mr Benschop's rhetoric was
approaching the hysterical. He urged peace 'for the time being' yet
played songs about war and showed a clip of military aircraft storming
a beach. He said he is prepared 'to stay and battle.' Later in the
evening Mr Benschop spoke of revolution as the way to go. 'A
revolution is good,' stated Benschop. 'We have to have a revolution to
move things forward.' He also continued his practice of attacking
specific individuals with defamatory charges with absolutely no
evidence to back up his alarming claims....
"On Tuesday. . . Mr Benschop's rhetoric became frantic and
alarming... He was increasingly bent on inciting viewers and callers
to take matters into their own hands. Indeed Mr Benschop's discussion
of revolution came when approximately ten per cent of the votes had
been counted and announced. "There is virtually no paragraph in
the Media Code of Conduct [he has] left intact.
"Also on March 20, Channel 9 continued to air provocative
programming including the regular show, 'The Message of An Oracle of
God', with Hubert Alexander. The host filled his show with a frantic
polemic that sought to justify war and bloodshed based on the
teachings of the Bible. He endorsed Benschop's previous calls for an
interim government. He claimed, 'I am giving warning on behalf of
God... Don't stand in my way.'"
The report concluded that the time had come for Channel 9 and others
to bear responsibility for these massive breaches of the code. "We
call on them to restore sanity and responsibility to their television
station and cease the broadcasting of programming that undermines the
election process."
The MMU also noted that "the state controlled media badly serves
the Guyanese public. Rather than offering citizens objective and
balanced information, they serve admittedly as a mouthpiece for the
government and an advocate for the ruling party the PPP/C.
"Some of the private media also offered unbalanced coverage of
the elections. It must be noted however that the Stabroek News offered
balanced and relatively comprehensive coverage of the contesting
parties to the election." The MMU called for a reconvening of the
Media Round table and additional means to be considered to censure
irresponsible behaviour. "In this regard we also point out the
urgent need to enact new broadcast legislation that would ensure that
those who use our airwaves are held to certain standards of community
service and professional behaviour."
The unit will stay on for another month to prepare a review of the
whole election period. It is hoped that the trained personnel and
equipment will be adopted by a non governmental organisation, and
could continue to monitor the local media.