Creating a climate of goodwill
Editorial
Stabroek News
April 4, 2001
At a time like this it is desirable to make gestures and take
initiatives that can create goodwill. With that in mind, it would be a
mistake to re-appoint Dr Roger Luncheon as Head of the Presidential
Secretariat for two reasons. First, it is in principle undesirable
that a politician be the head of the public service and secondly, the
People's National Congress Reform (PNC/R) has identified as one of the
initial issues for resolution the de-politicisation of the public
service. The appointment would be wrong in principle and it will send
a negative signal. As a senior member of the People's Progressive
Party/Civic (PPP/C) Dr Luncheon should be given a ministerial
portfolio, perhaps that of health. A senior civil servant should be
promoted to the top post.
Some of the other issues identified by Mr Desmond Hoyte, leader of
the PNC/R, in his statement on Friday night can also surely be readily
accommodated. These include working out a joint programme for the
revival of the bauxite industry, an inquiry into police brutality,
setting up programmes to tackle poverty and marginalised communities
and to provide jobs for the unemployed and the provision of basic
infrastructure for deprived villages. The PNC/R (and perhaps the other
political parties in parliament) can surely be quickly involved in
committees to discuss the setting up of these programmes. The goodwill
created would be enormous as it would make it clear that these issues
are being taken seriously and addressed urgently.
There are still concerns about the voters list. Informed sources
attribute the mistakes made largely to incorrect information from the
field staff and partly to incorrect data entry, some of this caused by
extra staff recruited in the late stages when time pressure was acute
and who could not be vetted. They rule out any chance of systemic
fraud as the Information Systems Department (ISD) of the Guyana
Elections Commission which was in charge of the production of the
voters list and ID cards had two managers, one who was there before
and one nominated by the opposition. The two were jointly in full
control. Above this was the Technical Oversight Committee (TOC) which
contained a nominee from the PPP/C and one from the PNC/R, two from
the donor community and two from civil society. They supervised the
work of the ISD and reported to the commission. Furthermore, two
members of the Commission, one PPP/C and one PNC/R, met the ISD and
the TOC each week to review activities and to plan.
At that level, therefore, there was no room for trickery or
manipulation. Mistakes were made at lower levels, primarily it is felt
due to clerical incompetence in the field but there were also errors
in data entry and some of that could have been deliberate.
The data has been frozen with a view to an audit. It is not possible
to say at this stage how many mistakes were made and how many people
were disenfranchised. Hopefully, the audit will give some idea of
this. The level of voter turnout was however exceptionally high and it
has been suggested that those affected are below half of one percent
of the voters.
The results by individual polling station will hopefully be published
before the end of this week. The order of the Chief Justice should
also be complied with before then. One would hope that the opposition
would then feel ready to formally acknowledge the government and that
this would immediately be followed by an invitation to dialogue. In
the meantime, it is obviously desirable that the new President should
keep his options as open as possible, that both sides try to lower the
political temperature and to make no provocative statements, and that
efforts in certain sections of the media to continue to cultivate
ethnic hatred and discontent be discontinued.