Controlling extra lessons
Stabroek News
April 6, 2001
In our Wednesday edition Chief Education Officer Ed Caesar was
reported as saying at a press conference last week that if new
education laws were enacted, extra lessons would be far more
controlled, and parents would find them much less of a burden than
they do at present. He agreed with a reporter that even some of the
pupils attending the established private schools took extra lessons
after hours, suggesting that parents thought that regardless of which
school their children attended, extra lessons were essential for good
results.
The legislation in question was drafted two years ago, but has not
yet been taken before Parliament. If the proposed bill and
accompanying regulations, said Mr Caesar, had gone to the National
Assembly earlier, then bottom house schools would have been
controlled, and some of them might even have become "extinct."
While legislation is important, it is, of course, a moot point as to
whether in and of itself it would have a major impact on the
situation. The Ministry of Education has in the past issued
regulations and guidelines about extra lessons, but nothing much has
changed. The real issue would be whether the new provisions - if and
when they are eventually passed - would actually be implemented.
In addition, it has to be remembered that the private tuition which
takes place throughout the school system now had its origins in the
failure of teachers in general (although it by no means applied to
every teacher) to teach to an acceptable standard during school hours.
The migration of many qualified and/or experienced members of staff,
the undermining of the professional status of teachers, and the
decline in the value of their real wages all played a role in bringing
about the current situation. There are many anecdotal stories of
teachers doing nothing in the classroom during official hours, and
then teaching the syllabus during extra lessons. It must be presumed,
therefore, that after all this time some of them have become
financially dependent on their unofficial fees.
What this means is that the Government cannot wave a legislative
magic wand and expect extra lessons to disappear overnight. There
would also have to be a change of attitude on the part of the teachers
involved as well as the parents, otherwise they will conspire behind
the backs of the authorities to circumvent the new law whenever it
comes into force.
In the first place, the administration would have to look seriously
at restoring quality teaching to our classrooms. Contrary to what it
seems to believe, this would not mean training large numbers of young
recruits who themselves have a deficient education at the primary and
secondary levels. Rather it would involve attracting back some of
those qualified teachers who have emigrated, particularly to the
Caribbean. This would necessitate that they be paid at rates which
were somewhat competitive with other Caricom territories. While
teachers' salaries have improved in recent times, they have not
increased anywhere near enough to persuade educators in the islands
that it is time to return home.
There would also have to be a campaign to persuade parents that extra
lessons are really unnecessary. They should not be afraid to report
teachers who do not attend classes regularly, or when they do, do not
teach those classes. An atmosphere of order and discipline in a school
starts with the teaching staff, and members of staff should be held to
basic standards.
The extra lessons syndrome has now become so entrenched, that with
the best will in the world it will take time for it to disappear.
Legislation is only the starting point.