Cricket - The greatest sport of all
Ian on Sunday
Stabroek News
April 25, 1999
When I was young I played a little cricket. Indeed, one of my most
precious
memories, a memory now nearly fifty years old, is of playing for my
school third eleven
on a rough pitch up at Mount St. Benedict in Trinidad and taking 5
wickets in one eight-
ball over with some slow and cunning leg-breaks which did not turn.
However, much
to my regret, I never became a serious cricketer. I played tennis hard
and grew to love
the game. And tennis was certainly good to me, filling my life with much
pleasure,
excitement, challenge, and reasonable achievement. It was a game that
introduced me
to many life-long friends and taught me, I think, a few of life's important
lessons.
And yet always, in my heart of hearts, I have thought that cricket is the
greatest,
the most splendid, game of all. If I had been given the choice by some
benevolent God
between winning Wimbledon and hitting a century at Lords for the West
Indies I have
always known which I would have chosen.
I have no doubt that cricket is in fact the greatest game yet invented. No
other
sport compares with it in the number of skills displayed: batting-skill;
bowling skill;
throwing skill; catching skill; running skill. It requires fitness, strength,
delicacy of
touch, superb reflexes, footwork like a cat, the eye of a hawk, the
precision and
accuracy of a master jeweller. It involves individual skill and nerve and
also unselfish
team play. It calls for short-term tactics and long term-strategy. In the
course of a good
cricket match there is a mixture of courage, daring, patience, flair,
imagination,
expertise and dour defiance that is certainly unequalled in all other,
more superficial
games. It is not at all surprising that cricket has inspired by far the best
and most varied
literature of any sport.
There are games that take strength, games that take more speed, games
that
require a higher level of fitness, games that require deeper resources of
endurance. But
no game equals cricket in its all-round deployment of all the talents.
There are games
that contain a greater concentration of excitement per playing hour. But
no game
approaches cricket in its blend of subtlety, entertainment, sudden thrill
and sustained
intellectual interest. Cricket, like no other game, takes the whole of a
man - his body,
soul, heart and wits.
Cricket - real cricket, that is Test cricket - has been
stigmatised by some as being too slow, too leisurely, lacking
in colour and excitement.
I believe this is simply one more aspect of the malignant modern
appetite for instant stimulation and quick-fire titillation. The slash-bang
games may sometimes satisfy the craving for a quick thrill, but they bear
about the same relationship to a good game of cricket as instant food
bears to a superbly cooked gourmet dinner.
It is like the difference between lust and love. There is, it is true, the
temporary
excitement of a passionate one-night stand. But who can doubt that the
more mature,
the more beguiling, the longer-lasting love affair provides the more
challenging and the
deeper experience?
So it is with cricket. Like any lasting love affair a good cricket match has
its
moments when the play is ordinary, slow-moving, and even boring. But
the complex
inter-play of emotion, psychology, and individual character, allied with
the sudden
bursts of excitement and the unexpected twists of fortune, add up to an
experience
which far outweighs the temporary and quick-fading lust for instant
gratification which
so many other sports supply.
One of the glories of cricket is the way the drama of a match develops,
how the
pace varies from the leisurely to the suddenly lethal, how the plot
thickens, and the sub-
plots are inter-linked, as the play goes on, how the heroes and the
villains take the stage
with time enough to act out their roles. A good Test Match is the equal
of a 5-act
masterpiece of the stage. Even the best of the other games can really
only compare with
one-act spectacles that pander to those whose attention-span is brief and
whose
imaginations are lacking. It may be that the latest pop star, with his
highly charged and
hectic act, can attract much larger crowds than Shakespeare's King Lear
or Berthold
Brecht's Caucasian Chalk Circle, but we all know that the one will fade
into oblivionhan Shakespeare's King Lear
or Berthold
Brecht's Caucasian Chalk Circle, but we all know that the one will fade
into oblivion
long, long before the other's glory ends.
I think there is a measure of truth in what the old men say - that in
cricket today
there is too much playing for self, playing for averages, playing for
money, and that
therefore some of the variety, and spice and spontaneity has gone out of
the game. And
yet ... and yet ... I wonder. Cricket is a game great enough to rise above
the limitations
of this overly commercial age. In cricket we will always have dramas and
performances
to match the past. Think of the West Indian victory at Kensington a
couple of weeks
ago. Surely the last 6 hours of play on the last day of that match has
never been
surpassed in sport for sustained excitement, nerve wracking swerves of
fortune and high
drama.
Cricket contains the pure stuff of human nature. As Neville Cardus
advised
long ago, you must go to this best of all games with your imagination's
eye, as well as
your physical eye, open. To the dull of spirit who merely looks at the
scoreboard,
"A Lara at the crease's rim,
A simple Lara is to him
And he is nothing more."
But to the cricket-lover of sensibility this Lara, and his fellows, are
artists all, and the game they play is the wonderful game of life itself.
|