Poll audit
meaningless
now - Hoyte
By Alim Hassim
Stabroek News
January 15, 1998
Efforts to have an international audit of the December 15, 1997
polls after the official results had been declared were yesterday
deemed "meaningless" by leader of the opposition People's National
Congress (PNC), Desmond Hoyte.
The PNC leader reiterated his party's aim to pursue an elections
petition challenging the results and to step-up the campaign
against an electoral process he described as `flawdulent', a word
he said he coined himself. He, however, declined to comment on the
forms of protest action to be taken in the stepped-up campaign.
Furthermore, Hoyte is advocating new elections, which he says,
should have as a pre-requisite an investigation "into the flaws"
that occurred in the whole electoral process.
The Private Sector Commission (PSC) and other bodies have been
working diligently to get the political parties that contested the
elections to agree to an international audit, which it felt would
eliminate the alleged discrepancies.
While some of the other political parties, including the People's
Progressive Party (PPP)/Civic, had agreed to such an audit in a bid
to resolve the problem, the PNC leader yesterday told a press
conference that the audit would "legally" not be the means of
solving the problem.
"First, because such an audit has been pre-empted by the
declaration [of the elections results] made yesterday [Tuesday] and
the Chairman [of the Elections Commission, Doodnauth Singh] had
earlier undertaken not make any declaration before an audit had
been carried out," Hoyte told reporters at a press conference
yesterday.
He referred to a letter he received from Singh, dated December 13,
in which he was given the assurance that "unless this process is
completed, the Elections Commission will not be in a position to
certify the final results of the 1997 general and regional
elections."
Making further arguments as to why the audit was not appropriate at
this time, Hoyte said, "...Very many of the documents necessary for
such verification are alleged to have been lost. The chairman said
that the officials hadn't sent them in and you would have seen some
of the officials denying it on television and one even called on
Singh to apologise.
"Subsequently, the chief returning officer, in the presence of the
representatives of the political parties and one or two observers,
admitted that all the documents had been received, but by the next
day they had disappeared."
In addition to those, the party leader said, "there is a large
number of discrepancies involving these statements of poll and the
figures that the Elections Commission had."
The series of irregularities and inconsistencies, Hoyte argued,
were so extensive that "one didn't know where one was going and in
the final analysis our people concluded that this exercise will
take us nowhere."
However, assuming that a verification exercise went through to the
end, there were two possible results, he said. One would have been
that the verification process could establish beyond a shadow of a
doubt what were in fact the number of valid votes cast and how they
were distributed among the parties. The other possibility "which I
think is more probable" would have been that the process would end
up with the auditors saying, "We can't make head nor tail of what
had happened and we cannot say with any certainty how many valid
votes were cast and how they were distributed among the parties."
But in either case, he said, the fact stood out that the Chief
Election Officer had signed in accordance with law a certificate
certifying the number of votes cast and the way they were
distributed. Those were the statutory duties of the Chief Elections
Officer.
"So no amount of verification; nothing done by independent people
outside of the law would change what the Chief Election Officer has
done.
So the whole idea becomes quite meaningless at this point in
time," Hoyte said. The earlier certificate was deemed by the
Commission to have been inadvertently distributed and was declared
invalid.
Elaborating on the party's pursuit of a legal petition against the
declared results, Hoyte said it was clear that the possibility
existed that advantage would be taken of the processes of the law
to delay the resolution of such a petition, "and in the interest of
this country we must find means to achieve a speedy resolution of
the issues."
He said the PNC could see no alternative to the holding of fresh
elections "especially in the context of the irregularities
surrounding the statements of poll, even where the originals can be
found; the counting and the integrity of the ballot boxes which
effectively excludes resolution via a simple recount of what's
currently in the ballot boxes".
The prevailing circumstances, he said had taken this issue far
beyond who won the December 15 elections. "The results are now not
verifiable in the context of the plethora of incompetencies,
illegalities and procedural snafus. All the data that could have
helped us has been irreversibly corrupted."
The issue he said, was now a wider one about the speedy restoration
of faith in the democratic process; about the avoidance of civil
disorder, provoked by the "unwarranted harsh treatment of peaceful
protestors by the Police Force."
Present at the press conference were commissioners Dr Barton
Scotland and Parris, who made statements regarding their concerns
about the electoral system. The conference was chaired by PNC
General Secretary, Aubrey Norton.
|