Even if the world perishes
By Ian McDonald
Stabroek News
January 18, 1998
I have never claimed to understand politics or politicians. Yet I
have often been accused, if that is the right word, of being a
politician.
I think this is said with the meaning that I contrive to sit on the
fence and don't really commit myself.
This seems strange since I thought the mark of a good politician
lies in the force of his or her commitment in politics. But let that
go.
I believe strongly in some things. I believe in what Oliver
Cromwell wrote in a letter he addressed to the General Assembly
of the Church of Scotland on 3rd August, 1650.
I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may
be mistaken! But I know that committed politicians cannot bear
ever to admit that they might be wrong.
And I believe in what Samuel Johnson wrote:
How small, of all that human hearts endure, That part which laws
or kings can cause or cure,
Still to ourselves in every place consigned, Our own felicity we
make or find.
I know that tried and true politicians cannot believe that there
could possibly be anything more important in life than "that part
which laws or kings can cause or cure".
But in the midst of the present public anger and ill-will, confusion,
dislocation and worse, I have no doubt that there are many
hundred of private woes-accidents, illness, family tragedies,
personal failures and problems-which in individual lives are
causing much greater anguish and apprehension than anything
happening in the streets and public places of Georgetown, though
those are the events which occupy a 100 per cent of the media
headlines.
So in the sense that I do not think politics are as important as
family life or good literature or spiritual pursuits in the largest
sense or, indeed, sport or friendship, and also in the sense that I
think that any man should stand ready at any time to admit he
could very well be wrong-in those senses I am not a politician and
thank the good Lord for that.
Therefore when I am told, as I am now continuously told, that the
current crisis has been utterly politicised (rather than
"nationalised")-on the one hand, being told that opposition
adventurers are using a fabricated electoral crisis for ulterior and
undemocratic ends or, on the other hand, being told that
Government leaders showed ugly disrespect for lawful
procedures and demonstrate no signs of addressing the
fundamental problem of how power is to be shared in a
desperately riven society-when I am told these things I feel out of
my depth and very naive in thinking that if only a little more logic,
goodwill and consideration for the long-term good of the country
could prevail on all sides then all would be well-or, at least, better
than it most tragically now is. But I suppose that is like asking for
a world without Original Sin.
Still, out of my depth and hopelessly naive though this particular
citizen may be, I think I can clearly distinguish some things that
absolutely do not assist in finding a solution to the national crisis.
First, peaceful protest is one thing, the intimidation of people who
want to work is quite another and surely unacceptable. Peace and
fear cannot co-exist and it is impossible not to recognise that even
early on the marchers, however well marshalled, inevitably
instilled great fear.
Secondly, above all, the attacks on people, the arson of vehicles,
the assault on stores, the use of fire-bombs, the disruptive bomb
threat hoaxes, and the invasion of public buildings should without
hesitation or reservation be condemned on every side.
Thirdly, what national good can come from the destruction of
assets which we will all need in the future? What national good
can come from the stirring of bitter memories of old hatreds?
What national good can be served by destroying, yet again, the
reputation of Guyana as a place where business can be done,
where investment can be secured, where lives and careers can be
pursued without uncertainty and fear?
When political power is at stake there is a stubborn, not to say
vindictive, self-righteousness and inflexibility at work among the
contending protagonists which is terrifying to the ordinary citizen.
In Roman times there was a saying-"fiat iustitia pereat
mundus"-which can be translated as "let justice be done, even if
the world perishes". Politicians of whatever ilk always most
sincerely believe that justice is on their side.
To them therefore, it is secondary if the world-or a
country-perishes so long as their particular justice is done. The
trouble is that when a country perishes it isn't only the politicians
who perish with it.
There is a story told in both Israel and Palestine. A frog and a
scorpion came to a river together. The scorpion says to the frog
"I can't swim. Please give me a ride across." The frog replies
"Don't be ridiculous, if I give you a ride you'll sting me and I'll
die." " Of course not", the scorpion responds, if I sting you and
you die then I will drown." "Well, yes, that's true", the frog says,
and gives the scorpion a ride across the river. Half way across the
scorpion stings the frog. As the frog is dying and both are sinking
the frog cries "But you said.......!" "I know I did", the scorpion
says with his last gasp, "but this is Israel/Palestine."
|