Professional journalism
Editorial
Stabroek News
January 24, 1998
The discussion of media responsibility is not some abstract debate
about principles that have no every day relevance. To put it bluntly,
particularly in times of crisis, truly irresponsible reporting and the
broadcasting of unchecked reports of violence and discrimination can
lead to people being attacked and and harmed. It is then too late to
say one is sorry.
The media must be bold and unafraid but they must also be
professional in their approach to news. Reports must be checked
before they are published, comments must be sought from those
allegedly involved, every effort must be made to obtain a balanced
picture. As the very famous editor of the Manchester Guardian, C.P.
Scott, once said, comment is free, facts are sacred. You can give
your opinion freely in your editorial columns but you have no freedom
to tamper with the facts.
Attacks on journalists on political grounds or their exclusion from
press conferences is unacceptable and strikes at the root of press
freedom. On the other hand if a particular journalist is continually
grossly irresponsible and biased in his reporting he cannot expect to
have the easiest access to politicians. The line is sometimes a fine
one and informed public opinion is the ultimate sanction one way or
the other.
We welcome the involvement of Mr Hugh Cholmondeley in his recent
meeting with the media in which he sought to promote the discussion
of various issues. Mr Cholmondeley repeated some views which he
had expressed some time ago in advice to the Minister of Information
namely that the standards of television broadcasting left a great deal
to be desired and that the enforcement of even minimal standards
would lead to some stations being closed. Certainly in the recent
elections many mature citizens were thoroughly alarmed by some of
what they saw on their television screens. The inexperienced persons
in charge seemed not to have the slightest concept of the disciplines
of the profession they were meant to be practising. Mr Cholmondeley
went as far as to say that irresponsible reporting could scuttle the
Caricom accord.
We note that there is to be a follow up discussion between Mr
Cholmondeley and selected representatives of the media to discuss
the way forward in improving professional standards. We welcome
this. The Guyana Press Association has not spoken out about recent
unprofessional media reporting which we believe should be an integral
part of its function. It should also be quick to react to attacks on any
section of the media and discrimination of one kind or another.
Hopefully, one of the benefits of Mr Cholmondeley's intervention will
be a more active and committed Media Association which spans the
unfortunate and unnecessary division that now exists with the Union
of Guyana Journalists.
|