Facilitator terms of reference for study by
donors
By Patrick Denny
Stabroek News
March 24, 1999
CARICOM and members of the donor community here yesterday met to
discuss the extension of the dialogue facilitator's work here and the terms
of reference under which he was operating was one area up for
consideration.
The meeting was convened yesterday by CARICOM Secretary-General,
Edwin Carrington, in response to a request for an extension of the funding
for the work of the facilitator and to discuss the terms of reference under
which the dialogue process and the facilitator have functioned, according
to United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Resident
Representative, Richard Olver. Among those at the meeting were
representatives of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European
Union and Canada.
The donor community, including the UNDP, funded the activities of the
facilitator, Maurice King SC, a former attorney-general of Barbados, up to
the end of his assignment on March 19. The funding provided was
US$81,000 to cover "expenses, travel and miscellaneous costs".
Olver, told reporters yesterday at a briefing on developments related to
the UN system here that the donors wished to finance a process which was
productive and there were questions in the minds of the donor community
regarding the best way to ensure this productivity.
"Thus far the process has been open-ended both in terms of agenda and
timeframes and it is our intention to discuss with the Secretary-General,
timeframes and agenda as possible elements in the extension period."
Other matters, he said, would include "the period of the proposed
extension, the role of CARICOM and its Heads of Government, as
sponsors of this process, in moving the process forward, the terms of
reference under which the process and the facilitator function." Questions
have been raised over whether the terms of reference under which the
facilitator functioned were adequate to allow him to do the job of getting
the People's Progressive Party (PPP) and the People's National Congress
(PNC) to make progress on the dialogue front. Dialogue between the two
parties is one of the menu of measures agreed under the
CARICOM-brokered Herdmanston Accord which was hammered out
following post-elections unrest in December 1997.
Olver said too that the political leaders whose parties are signatories of
the Herdmanston Accord "have been fully involved in this process and
have indicated their clear desire for the facilitator to continue his work."
The UNDP Representative said that he was "very satisfied" with King
whom he thought had done "a wonderful job under very difficult
circumstances" but was disappointed with the lack of substantial
progress."
Commenting on the criticism that the dialogue should not be restricted to
the two major political parties, Olver said that it was the belief of the
United Nations that it was "always useful to have parties to any differences
talking with each other."
"It is in this spirit that we have been sponsoring these discussions. It was
the choice of those directly involved to frame these discussions in this
fashion and we respect that choice."
However, Olver said that he was happy that parallel to the dialogue
process, the constitution reform commission was now undertaking its
work involving a wider spectrum of social forces, including other political
parties which could only benefit the wider process of national consensus
building towards reconciliation.
"We strongly support the work of the constitution reform commission."
One expression of that support was the donation of a Pentium computer
which Olver handed over to secretary of the commission, Haslyn Parris,
following the press briefing. Yesterday afternoon, too, Olver and
representatives of the donor community met with Foreign Minister,
Clement Rohee, and Finance Minister, Bharrat Jagdeo, to discuss the
allocation of responsibilities for meeting the financing needs of the
commission. The commission has a proposed $80 million budget to cover
its activities to July 17. Olver said that the donor community "was
interested in assuring that these activities go forward to the fullest extent
possible and we are coordinating with each other and the government to
determine the best way to accomplish that."
Olver refused to be drawn into commenting on the next step in the
dialogue process should the PPP and PNC fail to agree on the steps to
resolve the impasse in the dialogue. He explained that CARICOM as in
the past might want to step in in an effort to assist the process and that he
did not want to prejudge their efforts.
He said too when asked about the desirability of meetings between
President Jagan as the representative of the PPP/Civic and PNC leader,
Desmond Hoyte, that "dialogue should be continuous, occur at all levels
and should deal with a wide range of issues in order to be fruitful and we
will do whatever the parties ask in order to ensure that it is fruitful as it
can be."
Meanwhile in an effort to revive the dialogue, the private sector and its
civic partners will meet Hoyte today at their request to discuss their ideas
of broadening the dialogue process to include the civic organisations and
the other parliamentary parties.
The civic groups are also to meet with President Jagan but the details of
the meeting up to Monday had not been settled.
The dialogue broke down over remarks made by the leader of the
PPP/Civic dialogue team, Dr Roger Luncheon, to his PNC counterpart,
Lance Carberry, during the February 15 session of the dialogue. The PNC
had demanded an apology and withdrawal of the remark in which Dr
Luncheon said that the PPP and the PNC were not negotiating as equals in
the process.
The PNC has since indicated that it would accept withdrawal of the remark
but it must be given the opportunity to vet the withdrawal statement so as
to ensure that the meeting at which it was made was productive.
The parties have so far failed to agree on an acceptable form of words and
King has referred the issue to CARICOM chairman, Suriname's
president, Jules Wijdenbosch, for him to resolve. King has since left
Guyana and is prepared to return once the issue of the withdrawal
statement has been resolved and clear and precise parameters agreed
within which the dialogue process when resumed would proceed.
|