A West Indies World Cup win will be first miracle of 2003

- Says Colin E. Croft
Stabroek News
December 30, 2002

Related Links: Articles on Windies cricket
Letters Menu Archival Menu

Now that the West Indian selectors, headed by Sir Vivian Richards, have named the 15 players that are supposed to bring back past glories to the West Indies in the form of the 2003 cricket World Cup in South Africa, it is just about the right time for a reality check.

From the outset, one must appreciate the fact that the West Indies will have it very hard if they are to qualify for the `Super-Six' stage of the competition, not to mention get to the semi-finals and the final.

Despite the predictions of former captains Clive Lloyd, who led the West Indies to victories in 1975 and 1979 and the `Master Blaster' Richards, that the West Indies "could" win the tournament, one has to be realistic.

Just five weeks from the start of the tournament, the suggestion seems tremendously optimistic, at best, especially in view of Chairman Richards' realistic assessment that "we had to pick horses for courses."

One only has to think of the teams in Pool `B' to realize that the West Indies will have to play out of their collective skin if they are to proceed even beyond the pool games.

As a West Indian and former player and winner (1979) I would really like to feel that the West Indies will at least get to the semi-finals and finals, but that, in my mind, while not impossible, would probably be the first tangible miracle of 2003.

To be very frank, the West Indies cricket team has been too inconsistent over the last few one-day series to warrant such optimism. Oh, they did beat Bangladesh and India, in India, recently, coming from behind, but that came after the recent hosts had done similarly in the Caribbean.

Maybe when we are hosts in 2007, the maturing West Indies cricket team could be better placed for such thoughts, but 2003 is simply just too early, for a few reasons.

One thing in the favor of the West Indies doing well, however, is their evolving confidence after the two recent overseas one-day series.

On the practical side, the West Indies will play the first game of the series against the 2003 hosts South Africa.

This, in itself, is a tremendous honor.

The hosts saying `Thank You' for the support that the West Indies Cricket Board had given to the South Africans when they came back to international cricket in 1992. Dr. Ali Bacher never forgets, believe me.

The hosts, though, are on a roll, now that they are No. 1 in the Test cricket world, albeit an `empty' accolade.

However, after all of the pomp and the opening ceremony, you can be assured that captain Shaun Pollock and his guys will not want to be embarrassed in front of about three billion of the world's people, about a half of the world's population.

They will play it as tough as ever, and believe me, they can be tough, as was found out here in the Caribbean when they toured here in 2000, and in 1998, in South Africa.

Please remember the late and certainly lamented South African captain, Hansie Cronje, when he suggested that "he wanted to beat the West Indies so badly (in 1998/9) that he dreamt it every night."

He and his team did. The West Indies only won one game that series, a one-day game, from the five Tests and seven ODI's.

Then, earlier this year, in the Caribbean, New Zealand's captain Stephen Flemming, very much in the mould of Cronje; was determined to beat the West Indies 2-0 in the two-Test series.

Only the weather in Grenada helped the West Indies avoid that ignominy, the Kiwis winning a Test series (1-0) in the Caribbean for the first time ever.

New Zealand too are in the same group as the West Indies.

Of the rest of their group, the West Indies should, and I emphasize `SHOULD', beat Bangladesh, Kenya and Canada.

Please note, however, that Canada beat the West Indies `A' team, supposedly our second level of cricketing ability, in a one-day series earlier this year, while Kenya would never forget the beating that they gave to the West Indies in the 1996 World Cup.

So, surprises and upsets are very possible.

The other team in that group is a team whose unpredictability is similar to that of the West Indies, Sri Lanka.

On a good day, they could amass 300 in 50 overs, but, on a not-so-good day, manage just 100 all out. Yet, as recent champions, in 1996, they must never be counted out.

(Colin Croft is a former West Indies fast bowler turned cricket commentator and writer.) (Back to top)

West Indies World Cup 15
Should Hooper, Lara have been selected?

Former West Indies fast bowler Colin Croft takes a look at the West Indies 15 man squad announced by the West Indies selectors and asks a question or two.

So, what about the West Indies eventual squad?

CARL HOOPER

Having had knee operations in Australia recently, Carl Hooper has been retained as captain. The West Indies selectors must have had a few ticklish thoughts where he is concerned.

Should they select him in the final squad, and hope that all works according to plan, or should they not?

What a question!! All West Indians are now offering another collective prayer, in addition to the hopes for the New Year, that all goes well with captain Carl.

We can only hope and pray that he gets fit in six weeks time. At least modern medicine is on our side.

In Australia in 1979/80, Clive Lloyd missed the first Test after a cartilage operation but led the West Indies in Tests No. 2 and 3, doing well himself.

Let us just be optimistic here and just suggest that `modern medicine is great.’

The alternative does not merit a thought here.

CHRIS GAYLE

Chris Gayle, with his explosive batting and underrated but essential slow cutters, and good fielding too, was an easy pick.

What year he has had in 2002.

WAVELL HINDS

Wavell Hinds was also a shoo-in, with his un-orthodox batting style.

I would also suggest that his medium pacers should be used more.

Incidentally, I wonder if the West Indian scouts; I hope they have been looking on; have noticed that Australia, South Africa, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, play the `real’ fast bowling very much better that the medium-paced `dibbly-dobbler stuff.

With the present restrictions in the field, it is much easier to score from the faster stuff than the slow-medium deliveries.

MARLON SAMUELS

Marlon Samuels is gaining maturity like he takes in oxygen, with every breath.

His clouting of the Indian bowlers in that final ODI in India will be remembered for a long time.

His bowling too, like Gayle’s will be useful.

RAMNARESH SARWAN

Ramnaresh Sarwan and Shivnarine Chanderpaul will lend the stability if the blasters falter.

RICARDO POWELL

Ricardo Powell is another of the free hitters, but he too, like Samuels, is slowly learning that it is not necessary to hit sixes and fours at every ball.

If one is at the crease for 15 overs, 90 legal deliveries, (plus, inevitably, a few extras), and faces half of them, 45, one could be at least 45 not out without hitting a boundary.

That, folks, is about three runs per over from only one batsman, so there could be at least six runs per over in the overall average.

BRIAN LARA

Of course, the big problem for many was Brian Lara.

Despite what had been suggested in other quarters, I always would prefer that he be included.

Look, folks, Lara is Lara, mercurial, yes, but also necessary for maturity. Yes, maturity, in batsmanship, for this team, especially if Carl Hooper is still, realistically, doubtful.

The other political and other agendas should be kept out, for now.

Indeed, those should have been addressed so long in the past, at about 1992 and 1995, that it is probably impossible to get the cat back into the bag.

The horse had bolted a long time ago, so simply, we have to let it run its course until the steam and energies are absorbed.

At least some of both are still there for the 2003 cricket World Cup where Lara is concerned. Let us use it to our advantage.

The present West Indies cricket team, for all of its recent success, lacks real maturity in batsmanship, and needs both Lara and Hooper, badly, very badly, to go with Chanderpaul.

Of course, if Lara plays in the final XI, then maybe Ricardo Powell will miss out in the games, but those are the breaks sometimes.

RIDLEY JACOBS

Ridley Jacobs as the wicket-keeper and batsman was `no problem’, but the West Indies bowling certainly is.

MERVE DILLON

Merve Dillon has been, like his collective team, too inconsistent for his and the team’s good, but, again for maturity, has been included.

He must now lead from the position he seems not to realize he is in, the front.

JERMAINE LAWSON

Jermaine Lawson’s inclusion was also easy, as was that of Vasbert Drakes, for varying reasons.

Lawson is the future of our West Indian fast bowling attack while Drakes’s experiences in South Africa and especially his recent exploits in India and Bangladesh, at least showed that he is ready for the one-day stuff at the highest level.

PEDRO COLLINS

Pedro Collins too, in the absence of Dillon, showed some maturity in the recent series.

NIXON MC LEAN

I am not sure I understand the selection of Corey Colleymore and Nixon Mc Lean.

Neither is a killer performer, so one or the other may have been acceptable, in my mind, but neither could command a real place in the recent one-day series that the West Indies have played.

Worse than that is the fact that each respective RPO (runs per over) average in recent times is much too high, Collymore is at 4.06 and a strike rate (balls for every wicket) at 41.6, while Mc Lean is even worse, RPO 4.86 and S/R 45.3.

RYAN HINDS

I would have preferred a bowler who could bat, perhaps a Ryan Hinds, if he were fit enough, or even maybe Mahendra Nagamootoo, despite his less than effective bowling. At least, if he gives away 50 in his ten overs, Nagamootoo could make that 50 when he batted. Neither Collymore nor Mc Lean could.

While the suggestion for the inclusion of Mc Lean is that he knows the South African conditions having played there over the last few seasons, he has not exactly lit up the country with his performances.

I just wonder if this is not `Sir Viv’ and his selection committee, perhaps with the Rev. Wes Hall, as President of the WICB, in the background, not doing their bit for Caribbean unity by including the sole representative from the Windward Islands.

The West Indies will be very good unit in the not too distant future, but simply, 2003 has come just too early in the development of many of these players. Perhaps the development came too late in the piece, or maybe the individual players just did not `show’ themselves in time. For all that, they will have to work exceptionally hard if they are to progress from the group stages to the `Super Six’ stage, but miracles do happen, especially in these days of high technology and clones. (Back to top)

Harper, Skerritt get contract extension
THE contracts of manager Ricky Skerritt and coach Roger Harper are to be extended to at least the end of the forthcoming World Cup in South Africa, according to president of the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) Reverend Wes Hall.

The decision is to avoid the debacle of the 1996 tournament in India and Pakistan when Hall was team manager and the WICB dismissed captain Richie Richardson and coach Andy Roberts during the preliminary round, following the shock defeat by Kenya.

Richardson pre-empted his sacking by announcing his resignation two days before the WICB statement and went on to lead the West Indies to the semi-final where they lost by five runs to Australia.

On return home, he was replaced by Courtney Walsh and Roberts by former captain Clive Lloyd, who later became manager.

At the time, Hall called the changes “deplorable” and “diabolical”.

“I find it difficult to believe they had a meeting scheduled for the middle of the World Cup,” he said.

The three-year contracts of Skerritt and Harper officially expire on February 28, the day on which the West Indies play Sri Lanka in Cape Town in their penultimate preliminary round match, and the WICB has already put out tenders for applications for the posts.

“It would obviously be disruptive if any determination (on the posts) was taken during the tournament,” Hall said yesterday. “While we would interview applicants in the interim, a final decision would not be taken until after it is over.”

Skerritt, who replaced Lloyd, and Harper, the previous `A’ team coach who took over from another former captain, Sir Viv Richards, have been invited by the WICB to re-apply by the January 15 deadline but both have been uncommitted as to whether they would.

Hall said the WICB would do “all that is humanly possible,” to ensure that the team was up to the challenge in South Africa.

“The management has asked for five additional players to the chosen 15 to join the camp in Antigua leading up to the World Cup and we’ve agreed to that,” he noted.

“They have asked for a physiotherapist to be with the team throughout the tournament to augment (trainer and sports therapist) Ronald Rogers and we’ve agreed to that,” he added.

He revealed that Andy Roberts, the former outstanding Antigua and West Indies fast bowler, had been put in charge of preparing pitches at the new Airport Ground in Antigua during the camp.

“His mandate is to approximate as closely as possible to the fast, bouncy pitches they’re likely to encounter in South Africa,” Hall explained.

“This is going to be a tough tournament and we want to ensure that this team is 120 per cent fit and properly prepared for it,” he said.

The West Indies, who are drawn in pool `B’ in the preliminary round along with Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, New Zealand, South Africa and Sri Lanka, open the tournament with a day-night match against South Africa at Newlands in Cape Town February 9. Pool `A’ comprises Australia, England, Holland, India, Namibia, Pakistan and Zimbabwe,

The three top teams from each round-robin series advances to the Super Six round prior to the semi-finals March 18 and 20 and the final at the Wanderers in Johannesburg March 23.

Site Meter