On the Line: Demerara Bank Limited, September 30, 2002
Stabroek News
April 27, 2003

Related Links: Articles on banks
Letters Menu Archival Menu



Introduction
Today we put the spotlight on the financial statements of Demerara Bank Limited for the year ended September 30, 2002. Demerara Bank which was the idea of entrepreneur Mr Yesu Persaud, is a key component of the Demerara Distillers Limited Group of companies and has made tremendous strides since it received a banking licence in late 1994. Despite having a "more challenging" year than 2001, the bank showed significant improvement in almost every critical performance indicator, with income before taxes increasing by 23.9 per cent, income after tax by 19.6 per cent, and return on shareholders' equity by 12.6 per cent. The results for the year follow what this column described in 2001 "as a particularly bad year for the Bank with all the income indicators being the lowest in five years even before taking inflation into account."

While these improvements do not match the outstanding results declared by rival Citizens Bank, they are nonetheless very impressive and one has to wonder how in an economy that continues to deteriorate, our commercial banks continue to perform so creditably. Is there not something the banks can and should do to contribute to the revitalisation of the business community which is in such dire straits?

Commentary
The impressive results have made it possible for the dividends paid to shareholders to revert to the level of 2000 after having been reduced in 2001. The total amount paid out is $45M. representing 41% of the current year profits available for distribution. Since the Bank is a private company, the market value of the investment cannot be determined and it is therefore not possible to assess what the $0.10 per share represents as a real return to shareholders.

Despite the fairly substantial increases in interest earning assets, of which loans and advances and securities constitute the largest stake, interest income of $1,066M for the year was almost identical to the preceding year. Average interest charged on the performing loans and advances (19.28%) was the highest among the four banks for which detailed financial statements are available while the average interest earned on investments was 6.58 per cent. Interest expenses amounted to $709.9M or 6.5% on average total deposits, also high by the standards of the competitors.

The provision for loan losses increased during the year by $81.5M while the portion of the Bank's loan portfolio which is non-performing decreased by $417M or 20% (incorrectly shown in the Chairman's Report as 24%). As a percentage, non-performing loans make up 26% of the total loan portfolio compared with 31% for the previous year. Among the other banks, Citizens Bank was 8.8 per cent, GBTI 49.3% and NBIC 27.8 per cent.

Note 4 to the financial statements indicates a specific charge of $158M and write back of $77M on loan loss provisions, but it is not clear from the income statement where the net write-off has been charged. The three non-interest expenses are premises, personnel, and administration all of which would be inappropriate as a heading under which to charge write-off of loan losses. Equally unclear is the decline of over $92.8M in administrative expenses of which no details are given in the statements.

The Chairman described the reduction in the credit deposit ratio from 70.6% in 2001 to 50.4% in 2002 as "quite an improvement in liquidity" which makes one wonder what target the Bank has set on the proportion of its deposits which it would like to convert to loans - a main function of a commercial Bank.

Deposits have increased from $8.9B to $11.7B, an increase of 31.5% which the Chief Executive reports as enhancing the Bank's "market share considerably in Guyana." The reality is that market share has risen from 9.58% to 11.39% which could hardly be described as considerable. Such extravagant language is a feature of annual reports in Guyana and BP has drawn attention over the years to numerous misstatements none of which companies have found it necessary to correct.

The spread of deposits is quite interesting with professional services accounting for some 58% of the Bank's total deposits. This is not a category usually identified as a deposit-making group, is unique among commercial banks in Guyana and does not appear in the deposits table of the Bank of Guyana Statistical Abstract.

Financial highlights

The following table represents the Bank's highlights for the year:

                                                    2002     2001 

$M $M

Net income before taxes 249 202

Net income after taxes 129 107

Total assets 13,911 10,938

Total deposits 11,719 8,914

Loans and advances (net) 5,919 6,290

Returns on average assets (%) 2.01 1.84

Return on average equity (%) 2.63 11.06

Earnings per share $ 0.29 0.24

Related party disclosures
This is clearly a financial statements' issue with which published accounts of companies and Demerara Bank in particular seem uncomfortable. In its review of the Bank's report for 2000, BP had to comment on the inadequacy of the note relating to related party disclosures for which there is a specific Accounting Standard approved by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Guyana (ICAG). Instead of heeding the comments Demerara Bank completely omitted any reference or disclosures to related parties in its 2001 report.

Some attempt is again being made in 2001 report but here again there is a problem. Using a very innovative approach the report has sought merely to refer to DDL Group, IPED, and Guyana Airways 2000 Group, describing these as companies of which Chairman Yesu Persaud is also the Chairman of the Bank. Common chairmanship is only one of the criteria for the determination of a related party and in any case, the exclusion of Trust Company Guyana Limited is certainly hard to explain, since Trust Company describes Demerara Bank in its own financial statements as a related party.

Instead of disclosing the "types of transactions and the elements of transactions necessary for an understanding of the transactions," including volume, pricing policies and the nature of the transactions, all that the statements disclose is the net transactions and balances. Needless to say transactions with key management personnel are not disclosed, a common problem in Guyana.

Auditor's Report
Unlike the auditors report on the GBTI's financial statements reviewed in this column last week auditors, Nizam Alli and Company specifically referred to International Standards on Auditing as well as International Accounting Standards in their report. Poor John Bahadur and Savitri Thomas must be completely confused as to the inconsistencies in audit reports and financial statements published in Guyana. Surely it is time that the ICAG resolve the confusion in the public interest which must be its primary objective. No wonder the United States of America has under the Sarbanes - Oxley Act taken away from the auditing profession the right to set Auditing Standards.

Annual Report
The quality of the annual report seems much more modest than before but still contains too many photographs and too little relevant information.

Conclusion
Banks hold a special place in any economy and it is good to see them succeeding. However it is equally important that they show some lead in good corporate governance including reporting and disclosures. BP restates comments made last year:

"The Bank of Guyana must be aware that the accounting profession in Guyana is extremely weak and the BoG must question the extent to which the profession can be relied on to ensure compliance by financial institutions with the law. Its inspectors need to ensure that the standards are uniformly applied and that anomalies are properly investigated. They need to monitor the policies and procedures applied by licensed financial institutions and to pay careful attention to [their]... publications..."

GBTI: Correction
Business Page acknowledges that the GBTI figures stated as net income after taxes and total assets for 2002 and 2001 in our table were reversed. However the analysis was based on the correct figures. We sincerely apologise to the Bank and to our readers for this error.

Site Meter