‘Somebady lettin’ de cocaine pass’
Frankly Speaking...
By A.A Fenty
Stabroek News
June 6, 2003

Related Links: Articles on drugs
Letters Menu Archival Menu

By now, the caption qualifies to be the title of an “old” David Rudder Kaiso. (Or the subtitle to “Cry of a Madman”). In it he comments on the consequences of narcotic trafficking with the personal declaration - silently endorsed by most law-abiding citizens - that somebody, in officialdom, whether at an airport, other ports-of-entry, police station, airline; some “authority” is facilitating the export, sometimes import, of cocaine and other illegal, life-wrecking substances.

Today, I share some “insights” I, rather belatedly, picked up over the past few weeks, and repeat my morality dilemmas emanating from the all-pervasive presence of drugs in our midst. Of course, these thoughts and issues “resurged” when Miss Guyana Rahaman was detained in Canada for allegedly being a courier of suspected cocaine. (Incidentally, though personally I’ve had it with pageants - whatever happened to Ms Damond in Panama earlier this week - I did appreciate the attitude and lively intelligence of Mia, as I did the beautiful, brainy Olive.)

However, if ever Miss Rahaman is found guilty, I trust that she is appropriately penalised by the Canadians, as I would most likely be. As I write this, frankly speaking, I’m indebted to many persons and companies to the tune of millions. I have few secrets. I’m even guilty of some other social sins. But why is it that folks already financially secure should employ certain insidious illegal means to enhance or sustain their wealth?

And is it fear, old-fashioned upbringing, residual morality, that prevent me from trying drug trafficking, for example? Or just advanced age? I think I need the money - more than those already comfortable.

Obvious questions arise...
So who “allows the cocaine to pass?” Who’s in positions to facilitate the traffic? Obviously, first, the manufacturers, procurers, importers, “transshipment operatives”; officials and staff at ports-of-entry and exit, employees of these ports, these airlines, these shipping companies and those who are “security” personnel and cleaners - all these can provide the opportunity for the dishonest from time to time. Scrutiny is always needed, as these operatives must be of the highest honesty and trust, no matter how inadequate their salaries are.

But where do these drugs originate? Marijuana is planted here, by those who see no sin in “juggling two corn”. In what form is the cocaine? Where is it made? Where do the raw materials come from? Who arranges the international connections? And who are the various beneficiaries? Keep at it Customs Anti-Narcotics Unit (CANU). Here’s hoping that all your members are strong. And straight.

Catching the Barons
The courier, the mule caught at the airport - whether young sportsman, cabin attendant, sailor, grandmother or Beauty Queen - is merely a smaller cog in the bigger wheel of the Barons and the Brains behind the industry.

I was told that a few bold brave couriers do sing from time to time. But most fear for their lives and their families. Then too, the Barons and the “organisation” take care of circumstances when important, loyal couriers are caught. I was also intrigued to learn that the Canadian, British or American Agents - whose countries provide the lucrative markets - sometimes actually allow certain couriers “to pass through” overseas airports. They keep them under surveillance to trap the bigger fish. Sometimes for years. Until we hear of a big bust. How legal is that? Oh dear, poor me.

My ‘Morality Dilemma’
Since lots of the profits from the trade which remain and circulate locally, have to be laundered and made clean for use, many are the “fronts” or many are the new genuine businesses and enterprises established with the bloody funds.

Many of my own pals, even whilst acknowledging my puny effort to remain somewhat “moral” and “upright” at least consistent, constantly snigger knowingly and remind me that if I wish to be completely untouched by any trace of drug-trafficking or its influence I’ll have to remain at home continuously, permanently. So all-pervasive are the “consequences” of cocaine, they claim. This mini-bus, that bar, this store of bargains, that promotional entertainment: who is to know whether drugs funds are or were not involved somewhere these days? Poor me......

Lamely, I tell my friends that it still will not be morally right for me to support any enterprise knowingly funded by the narcotics blood money. For example, what does an otherwise law- abiding Christian parent tell his daughter who knows that he - the parent - is shopping at a drug lord’s store or “sporting” at a “suspicious” club? Should I give up?

Support Good Police....
Imagine a society with no police at all. Anarchy! Private Security Services or not. Everyday, a new crime, a unique innovative criminal act. And it’s our one overworked, underpaid C.I.D which has to handle the escalating criminal enterprise.

The above is just my own pitch this week to promote continuous support for the honest, brave policemen in the GPF. Against this hypothetical scenario. Hypothetical?

The C.I.D detective-investigator pursues a crime, apprehends and gets the perpetrators prosecuted and punished. In these days of post-February 2002 criminality, with the earliest directions given and available weapons in the youngest hands - that C.I.D detective is targeted, marked for death, however long after the conviction.

This is a planned, structured evil, intended to intimidate good police. To scare them off from doing their job routinely. (Not all cases could be attributed to Rogue-cop-bad business!). But this nefarious plan must not succeed. It is not succeeding. And we, the good people, must support the good police. Remember, we might disappear if there were no police at all!

Ponder...
1) Should America have allowed Saddam to remain in place? The hundreds of thousands who were tortured, killed - and their survivors/ kinfolk, what do they think? I listened to an eminent refugee Iraqi intellectual sharing his views on the BBC. He wants the American “occupiers” to allow religious-based Iraqis to elect and run local councils as they prepare for a new national government of all sections. Grave, complex challenges.

But why shouldn’t America lead the reconstruction? The world will “monitor” who controls the oil...

2) Be careful Mr. President! Your Presidential Guards are moonlighting a lot. However they should be of the highest calibre and extremely disciplined. And subject, to our laws. As exemplars.

3) What’s your slant, your drift, on the Guyana government not granting citizenship to the Cuban Doctor married to the Guyanese? Let’s explore this next week.

4) I understand the “Indian security dilemma” as articulated by the Swami, Dev and GIHA.

What would be the response of the new Ethnic Relations Commission? If it was functioning? And remember Swami, whilst I consider the deeper scope of anti-Indian harassment, I feel you should balance your concerns by acknowledging the fact that the “Black-dominated” forces are risking their lives to apprehend those crooks who - directed, organised or not - molest “Indians”.

4b) Score ten for the Security Forces - in the Bandits Buxton Den at 3:00 a.m! Heard the tone of the voices of the Bandit’s Public Sympathisers on Wednesday? Be careful. They’re hurt over their losses.

5) Anti-Beauty-Pageant as I am, I still backed the Golden Arrowhead in Panama City on Tuesday night. You realise that our neighbours were given the Nod? Brazil, Venezuela, Trinidad and Tobago?

‘Til next week!

Site Meter